Superconsultant

Your always-on AI strategic advisor. Explore organizational data, co-create initiatives, and generate executive-ready deliverables without waiting weeks or depending on external consultants.

After each Discovery Cycle, Horizon builds an organizational knowledge graph: conversations, quotes, highlights, insights, processes, and initiatives, all connected. Superconsultant is the AI interface that lets you explore and operate on all that knowledge in natural language, like having a senior consultant who already knows your company.

Built for answers you can trust

Evidence you can open

Every cross-cutting answer cites the real conversations, insights, and files behind it in the Sources panel. Each citation is clickable, so you can verify any claim in seconds.

Chat tools built in

Slash commands, @ mentions to tag discovery cycles, insights, people, or files, file attachments, and a one-click prompt improver that rewrites complex requests for clarity and structure.

Answers in your language

Ask in Spanish, English, or Portuguese and get the answer in the same language.

Scoped to your organization

Superconsultant analyzes your organizational data and nothing else. Out-of-scope questions are declined instead of answered with generic content.

How it works

  • Natural language questions about your organization. Ask Superconsultant about processes, insights, benchmarks, or initiatives in any area. Answers are backed by real data from conversations with your teams, not generic assumptions.

  • Co-creation of initiatives and deliverables. It is not just a chat that answers questions. You can ask it to generate business cases, process maps, executive presentations, and implementation plans. Everything is based on evidence Horizon has already collected.

  • Complete context, always up to date. Every new Discovery Cycle, Deep Dive, or Pulse enriches Superconsultant's knowledge. The more your company uses Horizon, the deeper and more accurate the answers become. It keeps context across sessions.

  • Flexible interaction modes. Type or use voice. Superconsultant adapts to how you prefer to work and can generate responses in different formats based on what you need, from a quick summary to a formal document.

Tune the reasoning depth

Superconsultant has four reasoning modes. Pick one based on how complex the question is: faster modes answer immediately, deeper modes take longer but connect more evidence and justify their conclusions better.

Fast

For basic queries

Status checks, inventory, simple summaries. Immediate, agile answers.

Default

Think

For intermediate analysis

Analysis that needs more detail and context. The best balance between quality and speed.

Deep Thinking

For advanced queries

Comparisons, benchmarks, ROI preparation, and strategic decisions. More robust analysis with stronger connections and justifications.

Exhaustive Research

For very complex or high-impact questions

Explores the problem in depth and delivers a complete picture, with solid, well-integrated conclusions.

Recommendation

Use Think for the best balance between performance and speed, and switch to Deep Thinking when you need more analytical depth.

Work with your files

Superconsultant reads the files you upload, crosses them with your organizational data, and exports results in the format you need. Ideal for preparing deliverables without manual work.

What you can upload

Images

Upload a process diagram, for example, and it interprets it and compares it with what came up in the conversations.

PDF, Word, and PowerPoint

Full documents are analyzed and crossed with existing insights.

Excel and CSV

It understands sheets, tables, and data structure.

What it can generate

ExcelPowerPointWord (.docx)PDFBPMN diagrams

Plus other formats depending on the case.

Prompting best practices

Small changes in how you ask make a big difference in what you get back.

  • Be specific about scope

    Say "in the {dc_name} DC", "in {country or area}", or "between {DC A} and {DC B}" instead of leaving the scope open.

  • Ask for format and columns

    "Give me the answer in a table with {columns}" or "return a prioritized list with justification".

  • State the goal

    "To free up hours", "to improve NPS", "to reduce rework". The goal changes how it prioritizes.

  • Chain steps

    "Bring me the insights, find patterns based on {criterion}, and export the result." One prompt can run the whole sequence.

  • Repeat what worked

    Save your effective prompts as internal snippets and reuse them.

  • Tag with @ and improve your prompts

    Tag users, insights, initiatives, or files with @, like "bring me the insights from @{discovery cycle}". For complex requests with multiple conditions, use the automatic prompt improver to sharpen clarity and structure.

Anti-patterns to avoid

Avoid

Vague requests like "improve finance".

Instead

"Prioritize 3 initiatives for Finance in {DC} to free up hours."

Avoid

Not asking for structure.

Instead

"Return it in a table with {columns}."

Avoid

Jumping to the solution without quantifying.

Instead

"First quantify impact and effort."

What to ask, from basic to advanced

Eleven ways teams use Superconsultant every day, ordered by depth. Replace anything in {braces} with your own names.

Level A

Basic: quick visibility and immediate answers

DC status and inventory

When to use it: To know where you stand and where to focus.

List my DCs with the number of conversations in each one.

List the people involved and their roles for {dc_name}.

Conversation information

When to use it: To consolidate knowledge and prepare committees.

Give me a summary in a table of the conversation with {person} in the {dc_name} DC.

What were the key points and agreements from the conversation with {role} in {area}?

Clarifications

When to use it: When a finding is unclear or there are operational doubts.

The {name} finding is not clear to me. Explain it in simple language.

Level B

Intermediate: diagnosis and decision preparation

Understand an insight in depth

When to use it: To understand causes, impacts, and evidence. You can also filter and analyze insights by macroprocess, microprocess, and insight run.

Analyze the {name} finding: context, causes, impacts, and evidence.

Which areas and processes does the {name} insight impact? Give me examples of evidence.

List risks and quick wins associated with the {name} finding.

Prioritization and metrics

When to use it: To order the backlog by value.

Prioritize the {n} insights from the {dc_name} DC to free up hours in {team}.

Count the findings from the {dc_name} DC by area and status, in a table.

Group the findings from {dc_name} into {k} themes and give me the top 3 by impact.

Processes and operations

When to use it: To map AS-IS and TO-BE processes, bottlenecks, and opportunities.

Map the AS-IS of the {process} process in {dc_name} and flag the bottlenecks.

Propose a TO-BE for {process} in {dc_name} with tactical improvements.

Describe the flow with inputs, outputs, and owners.

Tools and integrations

When to use it: To reduce manual load and duplicate tools.

What is {tool} used for in {dc_name}? Detect duplications.

How many insights are related to {tool} in {dc_name}?

People and participation

When to use it: For change management and discovery coverage.

For {dc_name}, list the employees in {area} with their role and main activity.

Who participated in the {dc_name} DC? Who has not answered yet?

Identify sponsors and possible detractors for {topic or initiative} in {dc_name}.

Level C

Advanced: from decision to action, with ROI and comparisons

Initiative generation

When to use it: When the problem is clear and you want to move to action.

I want to generate an Initiative for the {insight_name} finding in {dc_name}.

Propose 2 Initiative options (MVP and full rollout) for {name}, with KPIs and estimated ROI.

Build the business case for {name} with quantitative assumptions and sensitivities.

Internal comparisons and benchmarks

When to use it: To guide focus, resources, and quick wins by vertical, area, or country.

Compare pain points between {area_a} and {area_b} in the {dc_name} DC.

Compare pain points between {dc_a} and {dc_b}.

What opportunities show up in {vertical_a} vs {vertical_b} for {dc_name}?

Compare the most repeated findings across {list_of_dcs} and propose which ones could be tackled together.

External benchmarks

When to use it: To strengthen the business case with market references.

Bring benchmarks for {process or topic} in {industry} and compare them with our findings in {dc_name}.

Best practices to reduce {metric} in {process}? Adapt them to the context of the {dc_name} DC.

Typical ROI references for {initiative_type} in similar companies.

Prompt templates

Copy, replace what is inside {braces}, and add format when useful, for example "in a table with columns: impact, effort, areas".

Status

What is the status of the {dc_name} DC? Show me ID, status, and number of conversations.

Conversation summary

Give me a summary in a table of the conversation with {person} in the {dc_name} DC.

Deep dive

Analyze the {name} finding: context, causes, impacts, evidence.

Prioritization

Prioritize the {n} insights from the {dc_name} DC to free up hours in {team}, in a table.

Process

Map the AS-IS of {process} and flag the bottlenecks, as a list.

Tools

How do I integrate {tool_a} with {tool_b} to avoid manual work?

People

Who has not answered yet in the {dc_name} DC? List them with role and area.

Initiative

Generate an Initiative for {finding} (ID {id}) with KPIs and estimated ROI.

Comparison

Compare pain points between {area_a} and {area_b} in {list_of_dcs}, in a table.

Export

Export the prioritization as a PPT.

Ready-to-run playbooks

Sequences of prompts you can run as-is. Each step builds on the previous answer.

From finding to Initiative, in 5 prompts

  1. 1

    Analyze the {name} finding: context, causes, impacts, evidence.

  2. 2

    Quantify the impact: hours and risks, with explicit assumptions.

  3. 3

    Propose 3 solution alternatives (tactical, MVP, full) with effort and dependencies.

  4. 4

    Choose the best one based on {criterion: ROI, time to value, risk} and build the case.

  5. 5

    Generate the Initiative and export the executive summary as a PDF and the plan as an Excel.

Compare multiple DCs

  1. 1

    Compare the 5 most frequent findings across {DC A, DC B, DC C}.

  2. 2

    Group them into themes and prioritize by impact and effort.

  3. 3

    Propose cross-cutting quick wins with owners and next steps.

  4. 4

    Generate 1 cross-cutting Initiative and 2 vertical-specific ones.

Free up hours in a team

  1. 1

    List and count the findings for {team or area} by type and origin.

  2. 2

    Rank them by freeable hours and complexity.

  3. 3

    Propose 3 interventions (1 to 2 weeks) with success metrics.

  4. 4

    Generate the initiatives and export the plan.

Why it matters

Superconsultant turns weeks of analysis into conversations that take minutes. Instead of waiting for a consulting report, a transformation leader can explore organizational data, validate hypotheses, and generate deliverables exactly when needed. This is the difference between having information and acting on it right away.

Keep exploring

Connect this product to the bigger Horizon workflow

Jump back to the main platform overview, read the discovery framework behind Horizon, or see how our engineering team makes AI execution work in practice.

Superconsultant is already available in your account.

Open Superconsultant